Case cover

The Perfumer and the Moon Orchid

A perfumer's success sparks a debate over community resources.

Chapter I: The Account

The Facts

1

The Moon Orchid is a unique flower to Silverbloom, growing in a public preserve.

2

Ms. Vance, a perfumer, patented a process to extract the orchid's scent.

3

Her perfume, 'Orchid Moon,' is an international success.

4

The Town Council is demanding a 20% royalty on her profits.

The small, secluded town of Silverbloom is famed for a unique flower, the 'Moon Orchid,' which grows nowhere else in the world. For centuries, this flower has been a core part of the town's identity and culture, but it has never had any commercial value. It grows exclusively in the publicly-funded Silverbloom Nature Preserve. Ms. Vance, a resident and brilliant perfumer, dedicated seven years of her life and personal savings to studying the Moon Orchid. She eventually discovered and patented a novel extraction process that captures its unique, ethereal scent, which was previously thought impossible. She launched a perfume, 'Orchid Moon,' which became an international sensation. Her success is entirely dependent on harvesting the flowers from the public preserve. She has all the necessary environmental permits and her harvesting methods are sustainable.

Chapter II: The Arguments

Accuser:

The Town Council of Silverbloom

The Town Council of Silverbloom portrait

The Town Council argues that Ms. Vance's entire business is built upon a unique natural resource that is the shared heritage of all Silverbloom citizens. They claim that public funds have protected and maintained the orchids for generations. They contend her intellectual property (the process) is worthless without their communal property (the flower), and therefore the community deserves a significant share of the value created.

Defendant:

Ms. Elara Vance, Artisan Perfumer

Ms. Elara Vance, Artisan Perfumer portrait

Ms. Vance argues that the Moon Orchid had zero commercial value until her personal ingenuity, risk, and investment created it. She contends that she is already giving back by paying business taxes and harvesting fees. She argues that her patented process is the sole source of the product's value, not the raw material itself, which was available to anyone. To demand a 20% royalty, she claims, is to unjustly confiscate the fruits of her individual labor and intellect.

Chapter III: Your Deliberation

When an individual creates immense value from a shared, passive resource, what is the community owed?

0 deliberating
176 judged