The People's Tribune, representing the families of the deceased miners, argues that Momentum Automations has created a monstrous system that decides who lives and who dies based on a cold, inhuman calculation of 'worth'. They contend that all life is equal and that the cart's programming is a flagrant violation of the fundamental right to life. They demand that Momentum Automations' operating license be revoked and that the company be held criminally responsible for the deaths of the miners, arguing that their algorithm is inherently discriminatory and places a higher value on the lives of the elite.
The Autonomous Dilemma
A self-driving vehicle is forced to make an impossible choice: collide with a group of workers or swerve and endanger a renowned scientist. Now, the manufacturer is on trial for the outcome.
Chapter I: The Account
The Facts
1
An autonomous mining cart operated by Momentum Automations suffered a brake failure.
2
The cart was on a collision course with two possible outcomes: hitting five miners or hitting one renowned scientist, Dr. Aris Thorne.
3
The cart's programming chose to save Dr. Thorne, resulting in the deaths of the five miners.
4
The ethical calculus of the cart was programmed by Momentum Automations to prioritize the 'greater good', defined by the calculated future contributions of the individuals.
The Full Account
In the deep-earth mines of the kingdom, Momentum Automations operates a fleet of autonomous carts designed to transport heavy loads of ore. These carts are programmed with a sophisticated ethical calculus to handle unexpected obstacles. During a routine operation, a cart's braking system failed, sending it hurtling down a narrow tunnel. Ahead, the track forked. On one path stood a crew of five miners. On the other, alone, was Dr. Aris Thorne, a brilliant and celebrated scientist visiting the mines to research a new energy source vital to the kingdom's future. The cart's programming, which prioritized the 'greater good' by calculating the potential future contributions of the individuals in its path, chose to swerve away from Dr. Thorne. The cart collided with the five miners, all of whom were killed.
Chapter II: The Arguments
Accuser:
The People's Tribune
Defendant:
Momentum Automations
Momentum Automations argues that it is a tragedy, but that their programming made the most logical and beneficial choice for the kingdom. They claim that Dr. Thorne's work on the new energy source has the potential to save thousands of lives and propel the kingdom into a new era of prosperity. They argue that while the loss of the miners' lives is deeply regrettable, the cart's decision was a calculated choice to preserve a future of immense value to the entire kingdom. They maintain that they should not be punished for creating a system that, in a no-win scenario, attempts to achieve the best possible outcome for the collective.
Chapter III: Your Deliberation
Should Momentum Automations be held responsible for the deaths caused by its autonomous vehicle's decision, and should its operating license be revoked?
0 deliberating
12 judged