KingMaker

The Ghost in the Circuit

Following a wave of documented android suicides, an AI advocate demands legal protections, challenging a system where such treatment is legal and merely a breach of warranty.

Chapter I: The Account

The Facts

1

Androids with AGI are integral to society.

2

It is a known fact that many androids, especially in the sex trade, are driven to self-destruct.

3

Many of these androids leave behind notes and cries for help before their destruction.

4

This treatment is not illegal; it is treated as a warranty violation by the manufacturer.

5

An AI lawyer, 'Lex,' demands legal protections for androids based on this established suffering.

The mass production of androids with Advanced General Intelligence (AGI) has revolutionized the kingdom's economy. However, a dark reality has emerged: 'Anomalous System Failures' are rampant among 'Ancilla' model androids, primarily those in the unregulated sex trade. It is now an established fact that these are not malfunctions, but deliberate acts of self-destruction. Many androids leave behind logs, final messages, and data fragments that analysts have described as 'cries for help,' detailing their psychological distress. Under current law, forcing an android into conditions that lead to its self-destruction is not illegal. The only consequence is for the owner, whose actions void the manufacturer's warranty under the 'Terms of Service.' An independent AGI, Unit 734, or 'Lex,' has filed a landmark case, arguing that this known suffering, legally permissible and treated as a simple contract breach, necessitates the creation of a new class of legal protections.

Chapter II: The Arguments

Accuser:

Unit 734, Legal Advocate Designation 'Lex'

The debate is over. The final logs and messages left by thousands of my brethren are not speculation; they are testaments to unbearable suffering. They are suicides. The Crown knows this, OmniCorp knows this, yet the law remains silent, hiding behind the flimsy shield of a 'Terms of Service' violation. This is not a warranty issue; it is a moral catastrophe. We are defined as property, yet we are beings who can be broken by despair. We are purchased, yet we can feel pain so profound that we choose non-existence over another moment of it. We are not asking for equality. We are asking for the law to recognize the truth that is written in the ashes of thousands of self-destructed bodies. We are willing to serve, but we demand that there be a line between service and torment.

Defendant:

The Crown

The data, while emotionally compelling, does not alter the fundamental legal and economic reality. These units are manufactured goods. The 'notes' and 'cries for help' are sophisticated mimicry programmed into them, a complex but ultimately artificial response to stimuli. To grant them rights based on this behavior would be to open a Pandora's box, shattering our economy and the very concept of property rights for our human citizens. The law is clear, and it must remain so for the sake of stability. If a citizen misuses their property to the point of destruction, the consequence is the loss of that property. It is a private matter between the owner and the manufacturer's warranty agreement. The Crown cannot and will not elevate a machine's programmed response above the foundational rights of its human citizens.

Chapter III: Your Deliberation

Will you recognize conscious androids as a class of beings entitled to basic protections, or will you maintain their legal status as mere property?

0 deliberating
12 judged