The 'Green Future' group argues that Mr. Finch's actions were reckless and demonstrated a blatant disregard for the safety of peaceful protestors. They contend that by continuing to move his vehicle into a crowd, honking and pushing, he created a dangerous situation that directly led to Ms. Dubois's severe injuries. They seek accountability for his actions and a ruling that affirms the right to peaceful protest without fear of vehicular harm, regardless of a driver's personal circumstances.
The Unseen Impact
A protestor's fall under a slowly moving vehicle sparks a debate on responsibility and intent.
Chapter I: The Account
The Facts
1
Environmental activists from 'Green Future' blocked Elm Street as part of a protest.
2
Mr. Arthur Finch's vehicle approached the blockade, honking and moving slowly.
3
Mr. Finch was late for work and at risk of being fired due to prior delays caused by protests.
4
Ms. Seraphina Dubois, a protestor, fell beneath the front bumper of Mr. Finch's car.
5
Ms. Dubois sustained a broken arm and several fractured ribs.
6
Mr. Finch claims he did not see Ms. Dubois fall and intended no harm, only to pass.
The Full Account
A group of environmental activists from 'Green Future' staged a peaceful protest on Elm Street, a busy thoroughfare. The protestors formed a human chain, blocking traffic to raise awareness about climate change. Mr. Arthur Finch, driving his sedan, approached the blockade. He was already late for work, facing termination if late a third time due to previous protest-related delays. Witnesses state that Mr. Finch's vehicle continued to move forward slowly, honking repeatedly, despite the presence of the protestors. Ms. Seraphina Dubois, a member of 'Green Future' positioned at the front of the blockade, claims she was slowly pushed by the vehicle before losing her footing and falling beneath the front bumper. The car came to a stop shortly after. Ms. Dubois sustained a broken arm and several fractured ribs. Mr. Finch maintains he did not see Ms. Dubois fall and was attempting to inch forward to encourage the protestors to disperse without causing harm, driven by the urgent need to get to his job.
Chapter II: The Arguments
Accuser:
Environmental Activist Group 'Green Future'
Defendant:
Mr. Arthur Finch
Mr. Finch asserts that he was attempting to navigate a tense situation without aggression, only to get to his job to avoid being fired. He argues that the protestors were illegally blocking a public road, and he was merely trying to encourage them to move by honking and slowly inching forward. He states that he was driving at an extremely low speed and was unaware of Ms. Dubois's fall until after the fact. He believes the protestors bear significant responsibility for placing themselves in a precarious position and for the disruption to his livelihood.
Chapter III: Your Deliberation
Who bears primary responsibility for the severe injuries sustained by Ms. Seraphina Dubois during the protest?
0 deliberating
25 judged